As India's universities fail to cling to their already precarious positions on global league tables, old concerns about Indian higher education have been newly voiced.
There is much to be unhappy about, not just the position on the league tables. The skewed structure of Indian higher education means the significant number of bright graduates, educated at great expense by the Indian state, leave India every year for fortunes abroad. Despite the overt focus on technology education in India, the technology gap with its neighbour and competitor for global influence, China, is alarmingly wide. And, for the all their swagger, Indian business schools have languished at the bottom of global league tables and their graduates still struggle to find good jobs in India.
But I don't want to lament here about the obvious. In fact, I wish to make a point which is its opposite: The obsessions about global league tables, technology lead or employability, the three key factors driving Indian Higher Education policy, are parts of the problem, rather than the solution. India, a young country, is afflicted by an education system without a soul. India's higher education is part of the poisoned legacy of colonialism and this part has received little attention and have never been truly reformed. It remained, along with the structures of Indian Civil Service, a barrier, rather than an enabler, for 'making Indians'.
It's a tragedy, therefore. The history of post-independence Indian higher education should be written as one of the great tragedies in state-making, one that may yet have catastrophic consequences as the Soviet 'education for decline' of 70s delivered. And, its story may yet illustrate the key challenges for a country to become truly free: Affording such a change would have displaced India's elite and therefore, never featured on the 'independence' agenda.
I must clarify what I protest against. This is not about 'British' education as opposed to an 'Indian' one, and therefore, replacing Western medicine with Ayurveda, or English with Hindi, or some such thing. Fads such as those are already plentiful in India. My point is rather about more fundamental, what education is for, question: The East India Company administration answered it in a certain way. We have never got away from it.
The key change at the turn of the eighteenth century was the shift away from India's place in the world economy as an advanced manufacturing economy to a vast market of consumers and a source of raw materials, a change that the Company, its Anglo-Indian agents and their Indian collaborators, mostly rich Hindu beneficiaries of colonialism, brought about. The roots of English education in India should be found, not in the narratives of benevolent introduction of modern science or statecraft. Of Macaulay's famous pronounciation, 'English in taste' was perhaps the most relevant descriptor; and this was indeed the point of the idea of university in India.
At that point, English higher education was layered over an Indian one - 'engrafted' was the word that was used! And, Indians flocked to English education for the sake of employment and trade. At this time, as contemporary records will bear out, educated Indians conveniently came up with a dichotomy between education and morality: Education was a tool of professional advancement, and all moral lessons must be kept outside educational establishments. Only on this condition, an orthodox Hindu would allow his sons to go to college.
On the other hand, the Company, and the English administration that succeeded the Company rule, tried hard to keep any moral education - Christian or otherwise - outside formal education. Alexander Duff's various attempts to include Bible studies in the official curriculum was rebuffed; Colonialism was never to be - apart from the missionary efforts at the margins of the society - a christianising enterprise. The earlier ambitions of a 'pulling a Constantine' by converting a great noble to christianity were never really pursued in India. Instead, education in India was to remain an extension of capitalist enterprise, a secular, amoral, consumerist institution.
This divorce between education and moral thinking still underlies all Indian education today. The morality lies at home for Indians and the universities have nothing to do with it. All the well-meaning American disruptors who worry educators worry too little about employability should actually speak to any Indian educator: Employability is the only thing they worry about. It has always been that way and remains so. In fact, such an exposure will adequately explain why American assumptions are not applicable everywhere, as well as the limits of the obsession with employability.
I am arguing that this fundamental issue, rather than technical questions about curriculum, is the most important thing for Indian policy-makers to address. This is not a case for introduction of vedic studies or ancient science in the curriculum, nor of forcing Hindi down everyone's throat. And, on the other end of the spectrum, Liberal Arts, american style, will not solve the problem. It's like treating the symptoms badly (Indian education is already too literary) rather than the disease.
This, therefore, is the tragedy I occupy myself with. My endeavour is historical - trying to find the pre-independence thinking what this answer looks like - but that's just one dimension of the issue. But I think the answer should be forward-looking, rather than historical. It should be historically informed so that we don't miss the point all over again, but the key is to figure out what kind of India we want and therefore, how Indians should be educated. Many nations have had to go through similar reinventions of their education system at critical junctures of their history; it's India's turn now.
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
There is no other city like Kolkata for me: It is Home. The only city where I don't have to find a reason to go to, or to love. It is one city hardwired into my identity, and despite being away for a decade, that refuses to go away. People stay away from their homeland for a variety of reasons. But, as I have come to feel, no one can be completely happy to be away. One may find fame or fortune, love and learning, in another land, but they always live an incomplete life. They bring home broken bits of their homeland into their awkward daily existence, a cushion somewhere, a broken conversation in mother tongue some other time, always rediscovering the land they left behind for that brief moment of wanting to be themselves. The cruelest punishment, therefore, for a man who lives abroad is when his love for his land is denied. It is indeed often denied, because the pursuit of work, knowledge or love seemed to have gotten priority over the attraction of the land. This is particularly
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
India's employment data is sobering ( see here ). The pandemic has wrecked havoc and the structural problems of the economy - service sector dependence, uneven regional development and health and education challenges - are more evident than ever. Something needs to happen, and fast. To its credit, the government acknowledges the education challenge. Belatedly - it took more than 30 years - India has come up with a new National Education Policy. It is a comprehensive policy, which covers the whole spectrum of education and perhaps overcompensates the previous neglect by advocating radical change. As I commented elsewhere on this blog, it shows a curious mixture of aspirations, cultural revival and global competitiveness put under the same hood. However, despite its radical aspirations, the policy document often betrays same-old thinking. One of these is India's approach to foreign universities. The NEP makes the case for allowing foreign universities to set up operations in Ind
Introduction: Hastings in the history of Indian Education Whether or not one includes Warren Hastings in the history of Education in India is a matter of perspective. If writing the history of education means writing the history of schools, the impact of Hastings' administration would be quite limited. If anything, the rapid implosion of local rulers in Eastern, Southern and Northern India during Hastings' tenure had meant a bleak period for the indigenous education system, as patronage and funds would have dwindled away for many of them. The Company administration really concerned itself with the schooling of the natives only after 1813, as Nurullah and Naik rightly pointed out ( see my earlier post ) and one can legitimately start the story at this point. However, if history of Education in India is to encompass the transformation of Indian Scholarship, on which foundation the new, colonial, system of Education would be built, the story must start with Warren Hast
It's not often that I get to do things I like, but, as it happens, the lockdown came with a little gift. I was asked to develop, by an Indian entrepreneur with a strong commitment to education, a framework for a Liberal Education for one of his schools. And, as a part of this exercise, I was asked to develop a critique of Indian Education, if only to set the context of the proposal I am to make. I claim to have some unusual - therefore unique - qualification to do this job. I am, after all, an outsider in all senses. I have lived outside India for a long time, but never went too far away, making it my field of work for most of the period. I have also been outside the academe but never too far away: Just outside the bureaucracy but intimately into the conversations. I worked in the 'disruptive' end of education without the intention to disrupt and in For-profit without the desire for profit. Along the way, the only thing I consistently did is study educatio
Nations are ideas. We try to fashion them as territories. But how can a river, a mountain ridge or sometimes an imaginary line in the middle of a field can explain the wide division in the lives, thoughts and futures of the people who live on different sides? Nations are not the people too. Indeed, people build nations and become its body. But the soul of the nation is an idea: People come together on an idea to build a nation. While that's what a modern nation is - an idea - and that way exceptionalism is not an American exception, very few nations are as completely defined by an idea as Pakistan. There was hardly any political, geographic or military rationale of Pakistan other than the idea of an Islamic homeland in South Asia. [In that way, the ideological brother of Pakistan in the family of nations is Israel] This, abated by the short term political calculations of some backroom colonialists, created a modern state which must be solely sustained on that singular idea. Reli
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.