When the subject of establishing English style Public Colleges in India came up before the British Parliament in the late Eighteenth Century, the proposition was deemed to be both preposterous, as the Indians were deemed to lack the discipline needed for a college education, and subversive, as American colleges were blamed for the loss of British colonies there. The East India company administrators, however, were establishing colleges in India at the time - Warren Hastings modelled the Calcutta Madrassah following a version of famed Dars-i-Nizami curriculum followed in Awadh, followed by the efforts of Jonathan Duncan, the resident of Benares, to establish the Benares Sanskrit College - but these colleges were classic orientalist projects, for oriental learning and primarily for the benefit of English administrators wanting to understand Indian society and legal system. Such was the motivation of Wellesley's Oxford of the East - the Fort William College in Calcutta - which would not only train a generation of European orientalists but also rejuvenate Indian scholarship and contribute to the enlightenment project in Bengal.
This conversation changed in 1813, from the time of renewal of East India Company's charter, when the Company's Board, led by Charles Grant, evangelist and founder of Clapham Sect (and an old India hand who was close to Lord Cornwallis and tried to impeach Lord Wellesley), took a much more favourable view of missionary activities in Company territories, which was hitherto forbidden, and proposed the funding of public education out of company revenues. The sum was minuscule, but it was still significant as this predated any attempts at public education in England. In motive, also, this was different from earlier attempts by company officers: Whereas Hastings and others were attempting to step into the shoes of local rulers - India had an extensive education system supported by local rulers and enjoyed a higher rate of literacy than Europe even at the time of company ascendancy - the endeavours of 1813 was inspired by the reforming zeal of the evangelicals.
Indeed, the impact of this change in attitude would reflect in Indian administration a full generation later. Rather, the tenure of Marquess of Hastings in India (1813 - 1823), followed by Lord Amherst (1823 - 1828), is generally considered the golden age of Orientalism in India, distinctive for the Horace Hayman Wilson's pioneering work of Sanskrit scholarship and great archaeological discoveries of Hindu and Buddhist heritage of India. It was only afterwards, with Lord William Bentinck becoming the Governor, enthusiastically supported by the Utilitarian James Mill at the East India company, the shift of Indian Education policy was apparent. The 'Anglicists' - those who sought a transformation of India through English Education (like that of Ireland, where the Irish language was pushed into extinction by the conscious policies of Henry the eighth and later monarchs) - were clearly ascendant. Part of this project was pragmatic: Wanting to reduce the cost of administration, Bentick sought to employ Indians and needed to have them trained in English. The other part was motivated by the acceptance that India cannot be kept under control forever, and it would be through the English educated Indians, British connections - and trading privileges - would need to be sustained.
By this time, the earlier hesitancy about the Educated Indian - in the eighteenth century, India unified by Christian religion and the English language was thought to be a sure way to create national feelings - has given away to certainties about British moral and military superiority. Britain was at the height of its world power, and the abolition of slavery has supplied the moral confidence. When Macaulay was writing his Indian Education minutes, there would have been no doubts in his mind that the entire Sanskrit and Persian literature and science wouldn't even be worth a single shelf of an Englishman's library. James Mill's ideas of civilising a society by giving it civilised laws (English Common Law, in his mind) have been somewhat superseded within his lifetime, and civilising through education has already become the English mission.
There is another influence that one must not ignore in this conversation though. Indias were not, as is commonly believed, passive recipients of English educational ideas, neither the conversation about English education was solely an evangelical project, aided, in its late stages, by utilitarian agenda of spreading the European science. The Indians took the lead in creating private, rationalist, English education system, with their own money and effort, creating the famous Hindu College in Calcutta and setting in motion new education and cultural movements that challenged the Evangelical agenda of spreading Christianity. The project of rationalism in Indian Higher Education has been given somewhat marginal role, but its key figures - Raja Rammohan Roy, a high-born free-thinking Indian, David Hare, a Scottish watchmaker and rationalist, Henry Derozio, an Anglo-Indian Educator and founder of Young Bengal - played as much a role in shaping the Indian Higher Education as the British policy-makers did.
While Indians were kept out of Government jobs, by 1850s this has become a key demand of the English educated Indians. While some roles, primarily in the Judicial services, were being opened up to Indians, it was unthinkable, because of the stereotypes of a typically effeminate Indian averse to physical work, to put them in administrative roles. Yet, the English education in India was spreading fast, and by the 1850s, the Sanskrit and Persian schools were significantly undersubscribed. This was the setting, then, of Charles Wood's Education Despatch of 1854, where the earlier, rejected, plan of establishing a university in Calcutta was taken up again, and alongside a comprehensive plan for Indian Education, and the argument for promoting modern vernaculars, rather than Sanskrit and Persian (the two languages that gave Indians a common identity) was put side by side with the creation of affiliating universities in the three main presidencies, was presented as policy.
There are three important perspectives that help illuminate the motives behind this decision.
First, the idea of the Indian universities was taking shape at a time of unprecedented economic confidence, in the years after the Great Exhibition, when the old tributary-style colonialism was definitely out of time, and a new, consent-based (whatever that might mean on the ground) consumer imperialism [the type Hobson and Lenin would later come to describe, but one driven by free trade, rather than monopolistic ideas] had become the object of policy. The new Higher Education system was a part of the policy apparatus of free trade that co-opted the intended consumers in a culturally cohesive space.
Second, this is a time that the British administration discovered the Indian middle class. The traditional preference for the Indian elite - the British policy was to co-opt the elite into administration until they were thwarted by their refusal and, in 1857, rebellion - and the doctrine of Downward Filtration, the hope that an educated elite would spread rational ideas and English education [despite warnings that in a society divided by caste, it's hardly practicable], were both at an end. The loyalty of Bengali Hindu middle classes during the rebellion illustrated that the British rule can be sustained not by sustaining traditional social order and power structure, but through the collaboration with the emerging classes and an inversion of order. This was very much in sync with the Liberal Thought in England, and therefore, easily adaptable.
Finally, the British policy of encouraging Indian private enterprise in Education through a Grant-in-Aid system was successful in spreading English education (and destroying the traditional system), but rationalist endeavours in Higher Education also underlined the need for a Government imposed order. This was what the proposed Indian universities sought to do, to impose order through an examination system. Passing the examination became the object of education in no time, nipping the Indian experimentation with Liberal Education in the bud.
The foundational narrative of Indian universities, usually presented as a logical conclusion of Anglicist endeavours, or as a precursor of Indian nationalism, usually miss the point about an examination-based Higher Education system being conceived as a constituent part of a consent-based free-trade empire, one intricately linked with professions and livelihood, designed to create a middle class order. This is the story I am intending to tell through my work on Indian universities.
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
There is no other city like Kolkata for me: It is Home. The only city where I don't have to find a reason to go to, or to love. It is one city hardwired into my identity, and despite being away for a decade, that refuses to go away. People stay away from their homeland for a variety of reasons. But, as I have come to feel, no one can be completely happy to be away. One may find fame or fortune, love and learning, in another land, but they always live an incomplete life. They bring home broken bits of their homeland into their awkward daily existence, a cushion somewhere, a broken conversation in mother tongue some other time, always rediscovering the land they left behind for that brief moment of wanting to be themselves. The cruelest punishment, therefore, for a man who lives abroad is when his love for his land is denied. It is indeed often denied, because the pursuit of work, knowledge or love seemed to have gotten priority over the attraction of the land. This is particularly
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
Nations are ideas. We try to fashion them as territories. But how can a river, a mountain ridge or sometimes an imaginary line in the middle of a field can explain the wide division in the lives, thoughts and futures of the people who live on different sides? Nations are not the people too. Indeed, people build nations and become its body. But the soul of the nation is an idea: People come together on an idea to build a nation. While that's what a modern nation is - an idea - and that way exceptionalism is not an American exception, very few nations are as completely defined by an idea as Pakistan. There was hardly any political, geographic or military rationale of Pakistan other than the idea of an Islamic homeland in South Asia. [In that way, the ideological brother of Pakistan in the family of nations is Israel] This, abated by the short term political calculations of some backroom colonialists, created a modern state which must be solely sustained on that singular idea. Reli
India's employment data is sobering ( see here ). The pandemic has wrecked havoc and the structural problems of the economy - service sector dependence, uneven regional development and health and education challenges - are more evident than ever. Something needs to happen, and fast. To its credit, the government acknowledges the education challenge. Belatedly - it took more than 30 years - India has come up with a new National Education Policy. It is a comprehensive policy, which covers the whole spectrum of education and perhaps overcompensates the previous neglect by advocating radical change. As I commented elsewhere on this blog, it shows a curious mixture of aspirations, cultural revival and global competitiveness put under the same hood. However, despite its radical aspirations, the policy document often betrays same-old thinking. One of these is India's approach to foreign universities. The NEP makes the case for allowing foreign universities to set up operations in Ind
Introduction: Hastings in the history of Indian Education Whether or not one includes Warren Hastings in the history of Education in India is a matter of perspective. If writing the history of education means writing the history of schools, the impact of Hastings' administration would be quite limited. If anything, the rapid implosion of local rulers in Eastern, Southern and Northern India during Hastings' tenure had meant a bleak period for the indigenous education system, as patronage and funds would have dwindled away for many of them. The Company administration really concerned itself with the schooling of the natives only after 1813, as Nurullah and Naik rightly pointed out ( see my earlier post ) and one can legitimately start the story at this point. However, if history of Education in India is to encompass the transformation of Indian Scholarship, on which foundation the new, colonial, system of Education would be built, the story must start with Warren Hast
Italy recently apologised to Libya for its occupation of the country between 1911 and the Second Word War and offered an investment deal of $5 Billion over next 25 years towards reparation. This is largely symbolic, and investment deals could have been done without adding this moral halo . But the apology itself is an important step. The key question is one of principle, indeed. It is about whether the occupying countries do accept that their colonial exploits did enormous harm to the occupied, and whether they are ready to accept the responsibility. As the world becomes more sensitive towards the wrongness of occupation [even George Bush was heard saying that occupation of Georgia by Russia is unthinkable in the 21st century!!], and the world justice system gears up to try the leaders causing genocide and violence, paying for past crimes - including occupation - becomes ever more relevant and important. There are several issues which are still hotly debated - slavery, for example,
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.