I was in an Education Symposium in Singapore last Saturday and had this moment of truth: As one of the speakers were complaining about the lack of employer engagement in education, someone sitting next to me turned and whispered, "those who complain that employers don't care about education may not have met a real employer yet".
The latter is indeed the correct position to have, at least in a conference such as this, which is somewhat focused on the Education-to-Employment gap. The unannounced assumption behind such gatherings are always, as fashionable today, that education is out of sync with the wider commercial realities of the day, and there is a real concern from the employers that the modern education does not deliver the skills they need. The students, whose primary motivation for spending additional years in college is to have access to middle class life, are worried about it too. In short, whoever delivers a more relevant education for employment, wins.
So, to complain that employers are not interested is somewhat counter-intuitive. This is not even rational, because why won't they be as they have nothing to lose. Besides, employers keep talking about talent problem, and talk to any of those overworked, desperate recruitment managers, and you know how much they care about colleges delivering better graduates who meet their specs accurately.
However, as one would suspect, the speaker's position in this case was based on his personal experience, and so was the commentator's. The 'theory' that employers must be interested in educational output may need to be re-examined in the light of the practice, and it is perhaps sensible to accept not all employers are the same. If that sounds too obvious, one must add that there may be some rational basis for some employers to be less concerned about the state of education than others. And, rather than being an invitation to drop the subject altogether, this understanding may form the basis of engagement with employers.
So, why wouldn't an employer be interested in educational outcomes?
Indeed, the most obvious answer is the concerned employers' business model and competitive position. Some of it is obvious: Some employers are competing for talent, such as Google, but others are dependent on warm bodies, which are more or less available. The former gets to be the employers' voice at conferences more often than others, creating the impression that employers are desperate for talent, while what happens in the ground can be quite different. And, indeed, it could be quite different from place to place within the same organisation: What Accenture does in United Kingdom can be distinctly different from what they do in India.
Take, for example, the BPO industry, and we always seem to talk about the BPO industry in the context of education-to-employment gap in developing countries, the model is often bulk recruitment of relatively lower skilled workers. There is an established machinery not just for recruiting thousands of people, but also for rejecting many of them within the first few months, and only retaining a tiny proportion of this huge mass through promotions and development. In short, BPO employers are somewhat positioned as the earthworm for the modern economy in the developing countries, lowest in the food chain and in a brutal and roundabout way, a part of the educational value chain itself. A twenty-five year old with a couple of year's of BPO experience is the one who is in a real mess in the developing countries, and the education-to-employment talk is often more relevant to this person than the ones who have not been through the BPO grind yet. In short, education-to-employment gap sure exists, but it is at different places in different sectors and economies.
Besides, there are indeed cultural approaches to expertise and credentials in different societies. In theory, credentials should adequately reflect expertise. However, in post-colonial societies, where social power is closely linked to articulation because this connects one to those holding the powers (in the colonial tradition), the credentials may often be designed to reflect the ability to articulate than to do. In short, there may be an institutional divergence between credentials and expertise, and a socially accepted one. And, indeed, the societies which maintained a cultural continuity from the colonial times, expertise is less valued than credentials, because it used to be so. [Take, for example, India, where the greatly skilled Muslin weavers were systematically decimated by unfair trading systems imposed on it through the indigenous traders importing machine-weaved clothing from England: The first group's expertise was no match for the second group's ability to speak in English and closeness to their English masters] Within such cultural context, even the most competitive employers will be credential sensitive, but care less about the relevance of education (not surprisingly, the Indian government's groundbreaking idea for expansion of education to match the needs of the modern economy is to extend its flagship brands of IIT/ IIM to many more institutions, just as the application numbers to IIMs are at an all time low).
This may sound like a basic segmentation of the employers, and it is surprising how many of us just live in a bubble of our own empirical and cultural experiences. The education-to-employment gap exists, but it is far more complex than one would like to think. I have met many Foreign providers who believe that it relates to the quality of undergraduate education in developing countries and focus their efforts to solve this problem. These efforts are usually misdirected, because if the students speak good English, which they have to in order to get into these foreign education courses, they don't have an education-to-employment gap even after high school: They can get themselves into a BPO churn immediately. The big education-to-employment gap, instead, arise when they have emerged on the other side, cynical and brutalised from their BPO experience: In their mid-twenties, still living with parents or in a hostel, either without a job or in a hopeless one, they often seek to find a meaningful route back into life. The usual Western educational model wouldn't fit them, and venture capitalists are usually daunted to consider them as a target group because of their cynicism: But this is where education-to-employment gap is at play, not outside but perhaps even inside employment. This is the big hairy problem for the educators, and whoever solves the problem, wins in these markets.
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
There is no other city like Kolkata for me: It is Home. The only city where I don't have to find a reason to go to, or to love. It is one city hardwired into my identity, and despite being away for a decade, that refuses to go away. People stay away from their homeland for a variety of reasons. But, as I have come to feel, no one can be completely happy to be away. One may find fame or fortune, love and learning, in another land, but they always live an incomplete life. They bring home broken bits of their homeland into their awkward daily existence, a cushion somewhere, a broken conversation in mother tongue some other time, always rediscovering the land they left behind for that brief moment of wanting to be themselves. The cruelest punishment, therefore, for a man who lives abroad is when his love for his land is denied. It is indeed often denied, because the pursuit of work, knowledge or love seemed to have gotten priority over the attraction of the land. This is particularly
Introduction: Hastings in the history of Indian Education Whether or not one includes Warren Hastings in the history of Education in India is a matter of perspective. If writing the history of education means writing the history of schools, the impact of Hastings' administration would be quite limited. If anything, the rapid implosion of local rulers in Eastern, Southern and Northern India during Hastings' tenure had meant a bleak period for the indigenous education system, as patronage and funds would have dwindled away for many of them. The Company administration really concerned itself with the schooling of the natives only after 1813, as Nurullah and Naik rightly pointed out ( see my earlier post ) and one can legitimately start the story at this point. However, if history of Education in India is to encompass the transformation of Indian Scholarship, on which foundation the new, colonial, system of Education would be built, the story must start with Warren Hast
Introduction Erna Petri née Kürbs, a farmer’s daughter from Herressen in Thuringia, arrived in Ukraine with her three year old son to join her husband Horst in June 1942. Horst, an SS leader inspired by Nazi ideologue Dr Richard Walter Darré, settled in the plantation of Grzenda, just outside today’s Lviv, to become a German Gentleman-Farmer. Erna saw Horst beating and abusing the workers in the plantation within two days of arriving there, which was, as Horst explained, necessary for establishing authority. Erna joined in enthusiastically, settling into a combination of roles of ‘plantation mistress, prairie Madonna in apron-covered dress lording over slave labourers, infant-carrying, gun-wielding Hausfrau.’  However, there were clear rules in the plantation, and Erna was very much expected to play the woman’s role of being a Cake-and-Coffee hostess. When four Jews were caught in the estate while trying to escape from a transport to a death camp, Horst told Erna and her female
I wrote a note on Kolkata, the city I come from and would always belong to, in July 2010. Since then, the post attracted many visitors and comments, mostly critical, as most people, including those from Kolkata, couldn't see any future for the city. My current effort, some 18 months down the line, is also prompted by a recent article in The Economist, The City That Got Left Behind , which echo the pessimism somewhat. I, at least emotionally, disagree to all the pessimism: After all Kolkata is home and I live in the hope of an eventual return. Indeed, some change has happened since I wrote my earlier post: The geriatric Leftist government that ruled the state for more than 30 years was summarily dispatched, and was replaced by a lumpen-capitalist populist government. Kolkata looked without a future with the clueless leftists at the helm; it now looks without hope. However, apart from bad governance, there is no reason why Kolkata had to be poor and hopeless. It sits right
Meritocracy is a convenient lie, as Socrates foretold, and it is the ballast of the social system we have built. The story goes like this. Once upon a time, we had kings and queens and their families and nobles, who got the best meat and the best mate, and everyone lived happily. But then the things fell apart as luxury corrupted the nobles and feebled the spirits of their offsprings - and the peasants and the artisans came claiming their fair share. So we had the age of revolutions in Europe and North America, when we created a new, fairer social system, under a 'natural aristocracy of men', where destiny was no longer shaped by birth but by intelligence and hard work, and anyone could make it in life. And, everyone again lived happily ever after. Of course, this did not really happen. Slavery persisted, at least for a long time. The 'fair' system mostly excluded the real peasants and workers and once they have done their duty dying for various revolutions, they were s
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.