Will the 'University' Survive the 21st Century?

Darwin changed the way we think about the world. Before Darwin, there was God who created the world and the Man in his own image; everything existed with a purpose, and for that end alone. Darwin, almost boringly, offered us another vision: Of a complex, natural process, grinding on for million years, producing a great variety of life forms without a knowable purpose. The Man was no longer special after that, just an evolved animal with greater mental ability. However, the most profound impact of Darwin is perhaps in debunking 'teleological' reasoning, that species existed for a preordained purpose, and replacing this with less grandiose, almost boring, and perhaps even frightening, logic of evolution.

However, most conversations about universities (particularly in the West) are defined by a teleological reasoning, that the universities exist for a preordained purpose, quite outside the social requirements of the day. Rooted perhaps in the defining treatise about the universities, Newman's The Idea of A University, there is a sense of the lofty and timeless purpose, at least inside the universities.

This idea of things exist for a reason is grounded in the assumption that everything in nature has a purpose, which is no longer the god-given truth (the irony is intended) after Darwin. In fact, the talk of purpose is usually an argument to deny all other possibilities of change and keep the status-quo, though today's bureaucratic, government funded institutions have almost nothing in common with the Newman's ideals. Instead, the talk of purpose after Darwin is no longer an innocent appeal to natural tendencies, but an intentional rhetorical expression of power - and it should be recognised as such.

Indeed, an institution may not have any inherent, god-given purpose does not automatically lead to the conclusion that it should not have one. In fact, if we accept that the university does not have some kind of timeless purpose and identity, but rather a socially evolved institution that survived when the popularity of Church dwindled and Kingdoms fallen, it allows us to see what gives the university a role in the making of modern societies. But the post-modern abandonment of a search for purpose and instead living with the preoccupation of day-to-day business, the reality in many universities, may be a sure route to the vacuous rhetoric of 'quality' (as Bill Readings point out) and to eventual obsolesce that follows, with the university label is slapped on to an increasingly variable institutional forms, making, in turn, any talk of purpose completely unsuitable. In this context, whether the 'University' will survive the 21st century remains an entirely valid question.


Popular posts from this blog

Lord Macaulay's Speech on Indian Education: The Hoax & Some Truths

Abdicating to Taliban

When Does Business Gift Become A Bribe: A Marketing Policy Perspective

The Morality of Profit

‘A World Without The Jews’: Nazi Ideology, German Imagination and The Holocaust[1]

The Curious Case of Helen Goddard

A Conversation About Kolkata in the 21st Century

The Road to Macaulay: Warren Hastings and Education in India

The Road of Macaulay: The Development of Indian Education under British Rule

A Future for Kolkata

Creative Commons License