India Education Conference: 'A Case For Changing Higher Education Paradigm in India'
A Conference is being held to discuss Indian Post-Secondary Education in London on the 2nd and 3rd of October. About 100 delegates, from India and UK, comprising of University Representatives, Indian Educational Institutions, Education Innovation Companies and Private Equity Organizations, are expected to attend. Here is an opinion piece I wrote at the Conference Website outlining a case for change in Higher Education in India. For more on the Conference, visit http://indiainvestmentconclave.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“India has an examination system, not an education system”: Prime Ministerial Advisor C N R Rao
used these words in April 2011 to argue for a plan to introduce an
American-style common university admission examination across India, but
he also managed to capture deeper maladies of the Indian Education
system well.
Indian education, evolving from its colonial roots, still centered
around social prestige through a good job and entry into a privileged
class: a good education may indeed inflate the amount paid in dowry, and
in case of women, result into marriage in a prosperous family.
After Independence, the education system India built was “Tiny At The
Top”, as Education Researcher Phil Altbach calls it. The discussion
about education in India is still centers around this tiny top – the
IITs, the IIMs, a few elite colleges – institutions that attract the
best talents in India and prepares them, effectively, for jobs and
careers abroad. About 40,000 IIT graduates live in the United States
alone, a significant number considering that even in 2002-3, the yearly
undergraduate output of total IIT system in India was only 2,274
students (excluding Postgraduate and Doctoral students; the system has
been extended to about 7000 seats a year from 2008) The rest of the
education system in India, massive, underfunded, left to the negligent
and variable care of its state governments, largely produced graduates
for the jobs and careers in the public sector economy, which has started
vanishing with the “extraordinary fiscal contraction” in the last few
years, bringing deficits down from 10% of the GDP to about 7%. With
India’s current economic woes, there will be further contraction: these
jobs are not coming back.
The government tried to solve through the problem through expansion.
The extraordinary expansion of Higher Education capacity, that took
place since 2006, saw 10 colleges being set up in India, on average,
every day, mostly by private business groups. With more than 33,000
colleges now, India can boast the largest Higher Education system in the
world in terms of number of institutions, though, arguably, the size of
these institutions are very small, only 600 students on average
compared to China’s more than 8000 students per Higher Education
institution.
Many, millions, Indian graduates sleepwalk through college education.
The saving grace in the first few years of the new millennium was
English Language: the growth of outsourcing offered an opportunity,
limited and often with a dead end, for anyone who could speak decent
English. Then, since 2004, after a massive fiscal shift to rural job
creation, the new opportunities were in the Inner Market: in Banking,
Insurance, and in the industries taking modern consumer habits to rural
India. This expansion, however, with hindsight, was not about opening up
of new sectors, but a shifting mirage of job creation. It was more “the
charge of light brigade” than the usual happily ever after kind of
narrative: waves and waves of new graduates were absorbed into the
industry of the day, only to be left stranded, with stagnant salaries or
no jobs, leading to disillusionment, desperation, even poor health.
At this very moment, a mini economic crisis brings perhaps an
opportunity for reflection. Indian Education seems to be at a
crossroads, yet again. Its students seem to be stricken by the curse of
narrow skills, clueless in a shifting job market. Its employers seem to
be facing the problem of a “skills hour-glass” – a good pool of talented
and well-educated (read, educated abroad) senior managers, but a
dwindling skilled middle and front-line management pool, as well as
shortages of good researchers, teachers, designers, programmers –
inducing them to go to Krakow, Manila and Dublin looking for talent.
In short, a “change-or-stagnate” moment has come to India, and Indian
Higher Education must pick up the gauntlet. Policy-makers must stop
referring to the economic development models of the West, played out
centuries ago against the backdrop of imperialism, and start looking for
ideas in contemporary success stories, such as South Korea, Taiwan and
Singapore: tiny nations which were successful in transformation and an
extraordinary economic rise in a fiercely competitive world. Their
tininess should not matter given their gigantic success: the educational
models in these nations – one to develop broad range of real world
competencies, and citizenship values – may better suit India to face the
impending economic transformation. Education should not be about the
entry into privileged class anymore, but should be about enabling the
individual citizen to live a productive, healthy, engaged life.
Comments