My current mood was best displayed on my car's windscreen this morning: frozen on both sides. I am okay with cold, but this extreme winter is somehow playing havoc on my mind; this became amplified when I realized that I not only have to clear the snow that covers the outside of the windscreen, but inside it is frost too, frozen vapour, if that expression is valid. So started my day, struggling to get the car going after a cleanup, while my hand was feeling the freezing cold from inside the gloves.
Work life has, however, began at all earnestness. While my email is still down, and this gives me a feeling of emptiness of some kind, I realized that there are two kinds of feelings all around me: Those who are giving up and those who are starting fresh. There are lots of people who are in the process of giving up: They somehow survived till Christmas in the hope of a turnaround in the fourth quarter and can not go on any more. I received calls from two close friends, coincidentally one after the other, who have been laid off. I knew them for years and know that they are both exceptionally capable people, and somehow the circumstances overtook them completely. It felt sad, because I had ongoing interactions with both of them, and have benefited in the past through the association. Those two calls returned me from the Christmas Holiday remoteness to firmly on the ground, of post-recession hangover.
However, I would think it is more about some companies, and people, just giving up than the economy turning south. I know the retail sales during Christmas were strong, and the fears that some of the stores will go belly up just after Christmas will probably prove too pessimistic. But, I say this as I read the 'never knowing undersold' John Lewis stores chain, that overpriced British institution, and Marks & Spencer, a dated icon, have both done very well. And, if they do well, so will the grocers and the other retailers [I never see my local Primark store an inch vacant] - and the economy will survive. One can also see that the house prices have a modest rebound - up about 5.5% after the fall of more than 15% last year - and this will help brighten the sentiments. After all, Britain has become a nation of house-owners after the shop-keepers closed their shops or sold it to East African Gujratis.
This leads me to believe that there are many people in the second category, who are starting afresh. The other set of phone calls in the morning was about Merger and Acquisition activities, which seemed to have picked up. I learnt about a training company buying out an Further Education college, an important development, and an e-learning service provider. This makes the whole thing an interesting combination, almost a possible open college, in line with what I am working towards. I am obviously not one to see this dispiritedly. When the markets are too narrow, one fears competition. When markets are as new and as wide open as we have now, every competitor is a possible collaborator.
Besides, though the banks are still foot-dragging, giving out loans very miserly and at a very high rate of interest, there seems to be a new appetite for risk emerging among private investors. I have been discussing about a half-million pound deal with someone with very modest expectations, given the frozen state of the markets, but was pleasantly surprised that he was upbeat about raising the money from private investors, particularly from his middle eastern clients. I was instantly reminded of Dubai's troubles, where the Burj Khalifa will remain as a symbol of their humiliation, not aspiration or achievement; but it seems that Dubai's trouble may work out to be London's gain, with some money making their way back to Britain.
In the end, I spent the day thinking, somewhat in a sombre mood, on how to get the new businesses, both the one in corporate training in India and the other in the education space in Britain, off the ground. I have unintentionally slipped into a bit of a waiting mood, and looking forward to the visit to India in a few days time. I love hands-on busyness, and somehow this work-from-home in London is not very helpful. In the past, I discussed options of being closer to our HQ, but resisted the option of going over to Northern Ireland primarily because I did not see much avenue of growth after I relocate, and not many learning opportunities in my preferred space, that of technology enabled learning. After much thought, I did not want to bury my career into a very strange place, where more than 50% people work for the government and most of the daily life is unusually bureaucratic. In a way, I am responsible for my current despondence, but I don't regret it: I don't even think I could do my job any better if I retreated into the shell of isolation in Northern Ireland. Besides, every time I almost bought the idea, certain things happened - experiences of racially motivated behaviour - and I backed out again, carrying with me the impression that racial integration will possibly take years more in this small island of prejudice.
Today, I am reading something which is immensely interesting - Narendra Singh Sarila's The Shadow of The Great Game - a narrative of the partition of India based on the documents of British archive released in the recent past. It makes fascinating reading, and opens up a relative unexplored angle in the whole partition episode: That of British consideration of Geo-politics and the containment of Russia. It is interesting read, particularly when the Western powers are trying to contain the menace of Islamic fundamentalism arising out of Middle East. It is amazing to read about the British calculations to keep the North Western India out of the reach of the Indian nationalists, and under control of compliant Jinnah and the Muslim League who had no real connection with people [and exclude those leaders, like Sikandar Hiyat Khan in Punjab and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan in North Western Frontier Province, who did]. All of this, regardless of its human costs, was done to secure British interests in the Middle East and contain Russia. There is an embryonic thought in my mind: 9/11 was the end of the world as British imperialist knew and imagined it, and we are now in an age where we must imagine afresh. Subject of a future blog post, may be!
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
There is no other city like Kolkata for me: It is Home. The only city where I don't have to find a reason to go to, or to love. It is one city hardwired into my identity, and despite being away for a decade, that refuses to go away. People stay away from their homeland for a variety of reasons. But, as I have come to feel, no one can be completely happy to be away. One may find fame or fortune, love and learning, in another land, but they always live an incomplete life. They bring home broken bits of their homeland into their awkward daily existence, a cushion somewhere, a broken conversation in mother tongue some other time, always rediscovering the land they left behind for that brief moment of wanting to be themselves. The cruelest punishment, therefore, for a man who lives abroad is when his love for his land is denied. It is indeed often denied, because the pursuit of work, knowledge or love seemed to have gotten priority over the attraction of the land. This is particularly
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
Introduction: Hastings in the history of Indian Education Whether or not one includes Warren Hastings in the history of Education in India is a matter of perspective. If writing the history of education means writing the history of schools, the impact of Hastings' administration would be quite limited. If anything, the rapid implosion of local rulers in Eastern, Southern and Northern India during Hastings' tenure had meant a bleak period for the indigenous education system, as patronage and funds would have dwindled away for many of them. The Company administration really concerned itself with the schooling of the natives only after 1813, as Nurullah and Naik rightly pointed out ( see my earlier post ) and one can legitimately start the story at this point. However, if history of Education in India is to encompass the transformation of Indian Scholarship, on which foundation the new, colonial, system of Education would be built, the story must start with Warren Hast
It's not often that I get to do things I like, but, as it happens, the lockdown came with a little gift. I was asked to develop, by an Indian entrepreneur with a strong commitment to education, a framework for a Liberal Education for one of his schools. And, as a part of this exercise, I was asked to develop a critique of Indian Education, if only to set the context of the proposal I am to make. I claim to have some unusual - therefore unique - qualification to do this job. I am, after all, an outsider in all senses. I have lived outside India for a long time, but never went too far away, making it my field of work for most of the period. I have also been outside the academe but never too far away: Just outside the bureaucracy but intimately into the conversations. I worked in the 'disruptive' end of education without the intention to disrupt and in For-profit without the desire for profit. Along the way, the only thing I consistently did is study educatio
I wrote a note on Kolkata, the city I come from and would always belong to, in July 2010. Since then, the post attracted many visitors and comments, mostly critical, as most people, including those from Kolkata, couldn't see any future for the city. My current effort, some 18 months down the line, is also prompted by a recent article in The Economist, The City That Got Left Behind , which echo the pessimism somewhat. I, at least emotionally, disagree to all the pessimism: After all Kolkata is home and I live in the hope of an eventual return. Indeed, some change has happened since I wrote my earlier post: The geriatric Leftist government that ruled the state for more than 30 years was summarily dispatched, and was replaced by a lumpen-capitalist populist government. Kolkata looked without a future with the clueless leftists at the helm; it now looks without hope. However, apart from bad governance, there is no reason why Kolkata had to be poor and hopeless. It sits right
In our age, the only way to be politically correct is to be democratic. This is a post-70s affair - those days, still, some people had alternative ideologies in mind. Those alternate ideas are dead and gone, long discredited, and it seems that we have only one system which can make people happy, free and live longer. So, we have this huge export industry of democracy, and democracy's warriors, which the American security establishment has lately become. The democracy's businessmen, the bond traders, the media barons and the Hollywood types, are feted everywhere. The consensus is deafening and dumbing. It is indeed awkward to ask now - whether democracy is the right system for every society. It indeed should be. Collective wisdom is better than individual autocracy. In societies where democratic elections have been few and far between, the popular vote has demonstrated the extra-ordinary political savvy of the usually disinterested masses. Democracy has proved to be an excell
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.