I had a good last few days, finishing work that I needed to do and bringing back a semblance of order in life. This is not to say everything is absolutely cool - I must travel to Dubai and Manila by next week and I still don't have my passports back - but at least, I am no longer in the sad state that I was a week back. This allows me to take a bit of a break, if only for a few minutes, and enjoy this rainy afternoon in London. Funny that I say that, but it is actually raining after quite a gap, and giving us a break from the hot spell that we had for last two weeks.
So, tea, rains outside and a break! How Bengali does that sound? Though I don't smoke, I am as Bengali as one gets. And, indeed, proud to be one. I keep it no secret, and proclaim my love for Calcutta quite publicly. Yes, indeed, my dreams are to go back to Calcutta - whenever I can - and live there.
When I say this, my well-wishers here, most of them from Calcutta themselves, suggest that I should never think about that. There is no future, they say. You can't live there anymore, many warned - and I seem to agree. Ramrajatala, the little village in the suburbs that I come from, sounds like backwater, still, decaying, frozen in the past. Shall I not miss the hustle and bustle of London? Certainly. Shall I not miss the meet-the-world feel of Oxford Circus? Yes. I change the subject at this point. I say, I wouldn't live there, but I shall sure want to die there. This kills the buzz - it is too far to see, too sentimental to discuss and too hard to refute.
When I talk about this in India, I get a different feel. My Bengali friends in Mumbai and Delhi tell me to go back to India. This is going to be a developed country in 30 years and opportunities are all here, they say. Some suggest that Britain will be backwater in that time. I am not sure, but they have a point. I say, yes, I am planning to refurbish my house in Calcutta and I would come back - may be in three years. Silence. Then the message becomes the same - look beyond Calcutta, there is no future there. See what India has become in the last ten years, imagine what it will become in the next ten. Don't be a Bengali - see the opportunity! I change the subject at this point. Say that I love Oxford Street - it is so much like United Nations. The discussion shifts back to Britain, Cricket and Chicken Tikka Masala.
I read Ananda Bazar Patrika every day. This is a daily ritual of Bengalis all over the world [now that web allows it] - a gossipy tabloid of a newspaper which reflects the Bengali way of life. Which is all about making mountain out of molehill! The world affairs only make a news item if something bizarre has happened. There is sports reporting, but mostly about what may have happened in Dressing rooms than on the ground. Hardly any business news, though the rifts of Ambani brothers was well reported. But the newspaper still carries a lot of stories - of bizarre events, speculative gossips, celebrity idiosyncrasies. I love the pointlessness of the newspaper, it reminds me so much about Calcutta.
Of course, I am joking. But I know the pain of all my friends living in Britain or in Mumbai. They would all love to go back to Calcutta if they could. They miss this as much as I do. They all read Ananda Bazar every day, call home every Sunday, keep tab of Puja dates and wear new dresses on the Bengali New Year day. But they can't go back - Calcutta is so pointless, it offers them no opportunity.
I did say to someone that people create opportunities. You and I will have to create opportunites. We can't sit on our hands and complain. We can't criticize everything that's wrong, and do nothing ourselves. But I forget - they tried. Everyone living here have tried hard, made sacrifices, to make it work. It did not work - and they ran away from the post-industrial wasteland. They have made it here. They can't go back and try again - it is only one lifetime to live and you can't take the same chance again.
I read in Anandabazar Patrika that the opposition leader in Calcutta is trying hard to close an upcoming automobile factory near the city. I know the ruling party in Calcutta had tried its bit to stop the Indo-US nuclear deal. I know unemployment is high in Calcutta. I know we have severe power problems. I know it is pointless to talk reason. I know it is all about that pointless anger towards the past and pointless action in the present. I acknowledge there isn't any future.
But that's the point. Calcutta needs to have a future. National boundaries distort our perspective. Look another way, Calcutta is the hub, the centre of the World's poorest region. Cities are always fascinating. It is the dream that many people live for. Calcutta, that way, has the responsibility to give the dream to the world's largest population of the poor, the dispossessed, the illiterate. It must find its future.
I am a dreamer. Dreaming is great - it gives you many lifetimes to live. I see Calcutta finding its future. I see Calcutta as not in the colonial city, the second city of the British empire. I see Calcutta beyond its Socio-comic interregnum of today - a period when ideology bred lethargy and opposition became irresponsible. I see Calcutta as hope, for millions of people of Bengal, Bangladesh, Bihar, Orissa, Indian Northeast, Nepal, Bhutan and Burma, a city of democracy, liberalism and progress. I see Calcutta changing - making its past failures pay for it - a city with energy and enterprise.
I must state that I am not drunk. In fact, I have given up Alcohol months ago. I dream, but I know all of this is possible. But I have taken too long a break from work today, and must come back to this discussion tomorrow to say how I see this can happen.
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
Nations are ideas. We try to fashion them as territories. But how can a river, a mountain ridge or sometimes an imaginary line in the middle of a field can explain the wide division in the lives, thoughts and futures of the people who live on different sides? Nations are not the people too. Indeed, people build nations and become its body. But the soul of the nation is an idea: People come together on an idea to build a nation. While that's what a modern nation is - an idea - and that way exceptionalism is not an American exception, very few nations are as completely defined by an idea as Pakistan. There was hardly any political, geographic or military rationale of Pakistan other than the idea of an Islamic homeland in South Asia. [In that way, the ideological brother of Pakistan in the family of nations is Israel] This, abated by the short term political calculations of some backroom colonialists, created a modern state which must be solely sustained on that singular idea. Reli
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
Introduction: Hastings in the history of Indian Education Whether or not one includes Warren Hastings in the history of Education in India is a matter of perspective. If writing the history of education means writing the history of schools, the impact of Hastings' administration would be quite limited. If anything, the rapid implosion of local rulers in Eastern, Southern and Northern India during Hastings' tenure had meant a bleak period for the indigenous education system, as patronage and funds would have dwindled away for many of them. The Company administration really concerned itself with the schooling of the natives only after 1813, as Nurullah and Naik rightly pointed out ( see my earlier post ) and one can legitimately start the story at this point. However, if history of Education in India is to encompass the transformation of Indian Scholarship, on which foundation the new, colonial, system of Education would be built, the story must start with Warren Hast
As India's democracy reaches a critical juncture, with a very real danger of a authoritarian take-over, Rabindranath Tagore's birth anniversary is a perfect occasion to revisit the founding idea of India once again. There are many things in his politics that we may need to dust up and reconsider: Tagore's political ideas, because of his inherent aversion of popular nationalism and enthusiasm about Pan-Asianism and universalism, were outside the mainstream of the Indian National Movement, seen as impractical and effectively shunned. He was seen mostly as the Poet and the mystic, someone whose politics remains in the domain of the ideas rather than action. Tagore himself, after a brief passionate involvement in politics during the division of Bengal by Lord Curzon in 1905, withdrew from political action: He never belonged to the political class, despite his iconic status and itinerant interventions, such as returning the Knighthood after the massacre of Amritsar in 1919.
The story of British influence on Indian Education, to which Macaulay's Minutes of 1835 belong, has been told in six distinct phases. Syed Nurullah and J P Naik's very popular and influential History of Indian Education calls these 'six acts' of the drama: From the beginning of Eighteenth Century to 1813 The British East India Company received its charter in 1600 but its activities did not include any Educational engagement till the Charter Act of 1698, which required the Company to maintain priests and schools, for its own staff and their children. And, so it was until the renewal of its charter in 1813, when the evangelical influence led to insistence of expansion of educational activities and allowing priests back into company territory. From 1813 to Wood's Education Despatch of 1854 The renewal of Charter in 1813 re-opened the debate, which seemed to have been settled in the early years of the company administration, between the Orientalis
I spent the last week at the Ideas for India conference in London. This conference had different strands, and brought the diaspora Indians, India watchers and a number of delegates from India together. Because Rahul Gandhi chose to attend - a rather last minute thing which changed the published agenda somewhat - the media narrative revolved around his 40-odd minutes of talk. And, of course, a sense of discomfort hung over the whole conference: A wholly new thing for me and it shows how much India has changed. Somehow, the people in India seemed to think that no conversation about India should happen anywhere else in the world, a strange thing for a country which is anxious to assert its global importance. Additionally, anything outside the official channel is seen as conspiracy. Gone are those days when the presumptive opposition candidate, the current Prime Minister, could freely interact with the diaspora Indians and slam Dr Manmohan Singh's lack of initiative; today, this wou
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.