If I summarise what I wish to do going forward, it will be this: I want to work in New Education and stop working in Old Education.
This stands on a fundamental assumption that education is at a point of disjuncture, when the old ways of doing things must change. This idea, being proclaimed by educational thinkers, economic historians and technologists alike, bears out in my personal experience. My experiences in private and public education in UK and elsewhere tell me that we have built an elaborate and extensive system of education aimed at doing nothing: All the 'quality' talk that the Western countries take great pride of is actually a triumph of emptiness, as Mats Alvesson calls it. Bill Readings, in his book on Universities, did point out to the pointlessness of quality talk - that quality by itself means nothing - and this has now become an all-pervasive disease, quality assurance becoming the excuse for status quo.
The problem with this is that we are just fooling ourselves and sleepwalking to disaster. I see this in sharp relief in a country like India, where failure to understand and attack this problem may be causing 10 million failed lives every year. But it is equally easy to see everywhere. The failure of college is being talked about everywhere in the world. Orlando Figes of Birkbeck University complained that the students finish university these days without reading a single book (see here) and this is not just about changing media preferences. This is about what education has become and where the dyspeptic quality assurance departments are leading us to. The point is that in a rapidly changing world, quality assurance should be replaced by a Department of Imagination: Education's job is no longer to turn out standardised student experiences but to become an enabler of creativity and imagination. Being able to read books and having intelligent conversations are part of the latter requirement.
I am obviously equally conscious that 'new' is an equally empty term as 'quality'. It is important that the content of the idea is carefully defined, rather than obsessing ourselves with the adjectives. And besides, education is so far behind the curve that new is no longer novel, it was what was required as of yesterday. I have, therefore, spent time thinking about what the elements of a 'new' education could be.
The idea of 'newness' in education, I shall argue, is deeply connected with the society and its changes. In fact, one of the things that happened to education over the last fifty years is that it has become increasingly disconnected from social realities. This is partly about ivory tower thinking, but that surely is not all: The changing social attitudes towards political participation after the 1960s have a big role to play in de-politicising education, and the eventually de-coupling of education from social issues. Though the imminent death of sociology has been prevented with the rise of behavioural sciences, the idea that education is not for political participation but for technical engagement with institutions as they stand has become widely prevalent. When the society changes, however, desirability of these institutions as they stand, and new ideas as of what they should look like, become more important than ever.
So, I think the first element of this new education is its goal of creating socially engaged individuals, which is quite opposed to the current credo of newness in education - to create socially blind skills. The point, of course, is that socially blind skills are oxymoron. It stands on the somewhat flawed assumption, entertained both by educators and policy-makers, that employers know best and following the employer requirements is the best way to equip people with socially relevant skills. This, plus an industrial grade quality assurance based on data, is the best solution many educators and technologists offer to the current educational challenge. This, if anything, undermine the central tenets of education and skills. Employers' skills needs, mostly here and now, are shaped in response to social changes; they are not the social changes. Skills and abilities are constructed over a long period of time, so an education designed to respond to the shifts in employer demands can only be bad education. And, therefore, we need a different model for individuals who can anticipate and understand social changes and shape, rather than react, to changes as they come. This means focusing on entrepreneurialism, the ability to identify problems rather than merely seeking solutions. This means leadership and imagination, rather than just discipline in thinking and rhetoric. This will mean a theory of political participation, based on a personal ethic, which must emerge through personal engagements with the world. This will also mean a deep appreciation of the two disruptive forces in our lives, globalisation and technology. And, finally, this will also mean a lifelong commitment to educate oneself, as all of these things are likely to be a continuous process.
In summary, then, the 'new' education will have graduates with the following attributes: Entrepreneurial individuals who are able to anticipate social changes and influence them through political participation; those who imagine and lead, rather than give up their lives to technical bureaucracies and middle class anonymity; these globally savvy and technologically fluent individuals will commit to a life of learning and develop a personal sense of ethic and engagement. Indeed, this may sound like the mantra adopted in many top schools today, in different degrees; but this is not about the top schools but what education, at all levels, should aspire to be. I argue that our broken bureaucracies are coming in the way, and believe that I should spend time outside the bureaucratic college and fully inside the ferment of a new beginning in education.
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
Introduction Erna Petri née Kürbs, a farmer’s daughter from Herressen in Thuringia, arrived in Ukraine with her three year old son to join her husband Horst in June 1942. Horst, an SS leader inspired by Nazi ideologue Dr Richard Walter Darré, settled in the plantation of Grzenda, just outside today’s Lviv, to become a German Gentleman-Farmer. Erna saw Horst beating and abusing the workers in the plantation within two days of arriving there, which was, as Horst explained, necessary for establishing authority. Erna joined in enthusiastically, settling into a combination of roles of ‘plantation mistress, prairie Madonna in apron-covered dress lording over slave labourers, infant-carrying, gun-wielding Hausfrau.’  However, there were clear rules in the plantation, and Erna was very much expected to play the woman’s role of being a Cake-and-Coffee hostess. When four Jews were caught in the estate while trying to escape from a transport to a death camp, Horst told Erna and her female
I wrote a note on Kolkata, the city I come from and would always belong to, in July 2010. Since then, the post attracted many visitors and comments, mostly critical, as most people, including those from Kolkata, couldn't see any future for the city. My current effort, some 18 months down the line, is also prompted by a recent article in The Economist, The City That Got Left Behind , which echo the pessimism somewhat. I, at least emotionally, disagree to all the pessimism: After all Kolkata is home and I live in the hope of an eventual return. Indeed, some change has happened since I wrote my earlier post: The geriatric Leftist government that ruled the state for more than 30 years was summarily dispatched, and was replaced by a lumpen-capitalist populist government. Kolkata looked without a future with the clueless leftists at the helm; it now looks without hope. However, apart from bad governance, there is no reason why Kolkata had to be poor and hopeless. It sits right
Introduction: Hastings in the history of Indian Education Whether or not one includes Warren Hastings in the history of Education in India is a matter of perspective. If writing the history of education means writing the history of schools, the impact of Hastings' administration would be quite limited. If anything, the rapid implosion of local rulers in Eastern, Southern and Northern India during Hastings' tenure had meant a bleak period for the indigenous education system, as patronage and funds would have dwindled away for many of them. The Company administration really concerned itself with the schooling of the natives only after 1813, as Nurullah and Naik rightly pointed out ( see my earlier post ) and one can legitimately start the story at this point. However, if history of Education in India is to encompass the transformation of Indian Scholarship, on which foundation the new, colonial, system of Education would be built, the story must start with Warren Hast
The ‘Why’ Question? Adolf Hitler was appointed the German Chancellor by President Von Hindenburg on 30th January 1933. This was an extraordinary turn of events. Previously, President Von Hindenburg consistently refused to appoint Hitler the Chancellor, despite the impressive electoral performance of NSDAP in July 1932, Hitler’s uncompromising demand of the Chancellor’s post and a repeat election in November 1932 which failed to break the deadlock. Explaining his refusal, Hindenburg wrote in a letter on 24th November, “a presidential cabinet led by you would develop necessarily into a party dictatorship with all its consequences for an extraordinary accentuation of the conflicts in the German people.” The question ‘why’ Hitler was appointed Chancellor, despite the President being acutely aware of what might follow, is therefore a significant one. The NSDAP had election successes throughout 1932, and was already the biggest single party in the Reichstag and various Landtags acros
In our age, the only way to be politically correct is to be democratic. This is a post-70s affair - those days, still, some people had alternative ideologies in mind. Those alternate ideas are dead and gone, long discredited, and it seems that we have only one system which can make people happy, free and live longer. So, we have this huge export industry of democracy, and democracy's warriors, which the American security establishment has lately become. The democracy's businessmen, the bond traders, the media barons and the Hollywood types, are feted everywhere. The consensus is deafening and dumbing. It is indeed awkward to ask now - whether democracy is the right system for every society. It indeed should be. Collective wisdom is better than individual autocracy. In societies where democratic elections have been few and far between, the popular vote has demonstrated the extra-ordinary political savvy of the usually disinterested masses. Democracy has proved to be an excell
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.