Now that BJP manifesto is out, it is interesting to read and compare the manifestos published by two leading parties on the issue of Higher Education.
Admittedly, this is only a minor issue in this election. This election is, as I have written about before, more about the idea of India and how the republic will be shaped. Minds are focused on bigger issues of identity, and should be. Trying to deconstruct manifesto approaches on one issue or the other is surely inconsequential in the face of what's at stake. Besides, parties hardly keep manifesto promises, and BJP almost did not have a manifesto ('Modi is the manifesto', someone said in jest, but got it right).
Besides, if Manifestos are inconsequential, Higher Education is inconsequential among other issues addressed in the manifestos. Indeed, there are bigger issues and clear themes that cut across these manifestos, and dare I say that there are clear ideological undertones. Congress seems to be saying 'youth, youth, youth' and BJP seems to be saying 'development, development, development', which make these documents more point-of-sale material than policy documents. However, no one is saying 'education, education, education' and the message is that there are more important issues at hand: As we know, if one thinks there are more important issues than education, there will be.
But, manifesto reading to make a sense of where the parties stand in terms of Higher Education is a worthwhile exercise, simply as it shows other, deeper things about where the parties stand for. For example, BJP's manifesto talks about 'neo-middle class', something that may confound demographers and sociologists, but clearly this will be one thing to watch for if they come to power. The term is left unexplained, but the emphasis on serving this class is clear in the manifesto: By extension, this is clearly something distinct from the old middle class (which is perhaps understandable, given the old middle class, the intelligentsia, may stand for old values, not the ones BJP stands for).
Or, the Congress promise of many commitments to extend reservation, financial support to underprivileged and minority students. This is indeed in line with traditional Congress politics, but the fact that Higher Education is now one of the things that they would want to bring to their traditional clientele is interesting in itself. This seems to be an acknowledgement of their rising aspirations, just as the BJP's 'neo-middle classes'.
The BJP's manifesto is twice as long as Congress', and perhaps written after the Congress manifesto was out. The BJP manifesto was much business-like, and, in fact, if I may be forgiven for this comment, seems to have been written by businesses.
For example, the contrast among these statements are clear:
"The Corpus of the Maulana Azad Education Foundation has been more than tripled to over Rs 700 crore in an attempt to encourage candidates from the minority communities to pursue opportunities in higher education. We will work to create a ready corpus, along the lines of the Maulana Azad Educational Fund for young entrepreneurs. Skills development programmes for minorities which have been carried out successfully in various districts, will be implemented across the country." (Indian National Congress Manifesto, 2014)
"To focus on higher education, we launched the Rashtriya Uchhatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) to provide strategic funding to improve college and university infrastructure. RUSA will help create 70 new universities, provide infrastructure in current universities, upgrade autonomous colleges to Universities, and create a new model of general degree colleges and professional institutions." (Indian National Congress Manifesto)
With the statements such as these:
"We will run short-term courses, in the evenings, focusing on employable skills." (BJP Manifesto)
" Would set up Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) and virtual classrooms to make it convenient for working class people and housewives to further their knowledge and qualifications." (BJP Manifesto)
Indeed, one shouldn't try to read much in the Stylistic differences apart from the fact that the incumbent party is drawing on existing policies while the opposition is throwing in all the good ideas they can without having to decide how it will be done. If we complain that some of BJP's suggestions seem to knee-jerk, their retort is likely to be that they have suggested setting up a National Commission for Education, which should come up with a recommendation within two years about what to do with education: That, they will point to, is when their manifesto promises will be substantiated.
Apart from these, there are other interesting points to notice. Congress manifesto is indeed more of the same, continuation of the skills mission (which appear in BJP's manifesto too, with significant differences), more universities (70 more, apart from conversion of autonomous colleges into universities and expansion of infrastructure of current universities, as above), reformation of regulatory mechanism to look into Private and State universities, expanded funding for minority and disadvantaged students. The most interesting bits relate to an expressed commitment to sports, with a National University to be set up, scouting activities to increase etc., which is somewhat novel but in line with the 'youth' mantra of the party. The Congress manifesto also mentions foreign participation in India's education sector, a mention that will warm many hearts in Western university circles, and that the party has found it significant enough to include in the manifesto is surprising. Congress' manifesto also makes an unambiguous reference to encourage private participation, and talks about development of a "new public-private model" (though its reference is restricted to the context of secondary education).
Among the most important acts of omission in the Congress manifesto is any specific reference to Lifelong Learning. India's education problem is not just restricted to its school-goers (Congress manifesto is explicit in its commitment to reduce drop-out rates) and its youth, but the vast mass of middle aged workers who are already in the workforce but have little or outdated skills and abilities. Congress' manifesto completely overlooks them, not surprising given the party's youth obsession, but somewhat symptomatic of the limitations of the manifestos as well as Congress' own habit of naval-gazing (where its own message to itself is considered more important than what the world may want to hear).
Apart from the stylistic differences mentioned above, BJP's manifesto, as is expected, refuses to follow the existing policy line, and rather hinges its policy, apart from some of those trendy pronouncements which Manifesto writers may have thought would make them look savvy and in-touch, on setting up a National Commission for Education, which should recommend what to do with education. For an opposition party, this is fine: They don't have to commit to the policies of the old administration, and they are perfectly entitled to prompt a rethink. However, one could read more than what is stated here: Given the ideological nature of the BJP, National Commission for Education may indeed enjoy a wider brief than what's stated here. One of the key agenda for any incoming BJP administration will be to gain greater control of what's taught - the last BJP administration attempted to change curriculum wherever they could and tried to restrict institutional autonomy - and with a person like Mr Modi at the helm, this will surely become a matter of policy. So, the apparently innocent suggestion about the National Commission may not be insignificant at all, and one has to watch out for further developments.
Despite BJP's stated ambition of keeping some of the money the Indian students spend studying abroad in India, BJP manifesto is silent about any foreign participation in India's education sector. Combined with their rejection of foreign investment in retail, this may be seen to be typical. But this may have a political motivation - an ideological party like BJP and an administration like Mr Modi's, if there is to be one, will need complete control of ideas. So, the issue of foreign participation in education is not one like in retail: The former is a direct problem for 'national resurgence' (or 'BJP-fication) of India, the latter is only a concession for friendly industrialists. The BJP's educational goals are stated to be "national integration, social cohesion, religious amity, national identity and patriotism", and given the cultural nature of these objectives, one can't see an open door policy for multinational universities.
The BJP manifesto is clearly committed to the 'neo middle classes' and goes a long way in addressing the Lifelong Learning problem so conspicuously ignored by the Congress. Apart from the slightly off-hand commitments like 'evening classes' and 'MOOCs', BJP is talking about creating structures of adult vocational learning with pathways to academic qualifications. This is an interesting departure from the Congress policy, which placed the emphasis on skilling the unskilled, rural youth, and combatted the 'degree fetish' in India. While the BJP manifesto does not explicitly suggest a shift of emphasis in skills 'mission' (their word), the suggestion that they don't see the academic/vocational divide the way Congress sees may only suggest that they see adult vocational learning being accessed by other people, urban middle classes, for example, who may want to have degrees in Culinary Arts, for example. I shall argue that this stands for a subtle shift of emphasis in the Skills Mission, as it stands today.
There is indeed more, and semantic differences abound. However, one shouldn't read too much into the manifesto, apart from general statements about intent. In that sense, Congress remains firmly committed to its Social Democratic roots, but places its faith in big business, as it has done in the recent years. There is a Pro-youth, pro-private business, pro-open market theme running through the manifesto, with the balancing acts of funding and opportunities for minorities and rural youth. BJP's start point, unsurprisingly, is urban 'neo middle class', and its policy intention is pro-urban, pro-national business, and with a strong national culture emphasis. These ideas manifest in all the areas, as well as in Higher Ed. That is, indeed, the idea of a political manifesto.
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
Introduction Erna Petri née Kürbs, a farmer’s daughter from Herressen in Thuringia, arrived in Ukraine with her three year old son to join her husband Horst in June 1942. Horst, an SS leader inspired by Nazi ideologue Dr Richard Walter Darré, settled in the plantation of Grzenda, just outside today’s Lviv, to become a German Gentleman-Farmer. Erna saw Horst beating and abusing the workers in the plantation within two days of arriving there, which was, as Horst explained, necessary for establishing authority. Erna joined in enthusiastically, settling into a combination of roles of ‘plantation mistress, prairie Madonna in apron-covered dress lording over slave labourers, infant-carrying, gun-wielding Hausfrau.’  However, there were clear rules in the plantation, and Erna was very much expected to play the woman’s role of being a Cake-and-Coffee hostess. When four Jews were caught in the estate while trying to escape from a transport to a death camp, Horst told Erna and her female
I wrote a note on Kolkata, the city I come from and would always belong to, in July 2010. Since then, the post attracted many visitors and comments, mostly critical, as most people, including those from Kolkata, couldn't see any future for the city. My current effort, some 18 months down the line, is also prompted by a recent article in The Economist, The City That Got Left Behind , which echo the pessimism somewhat. I, at least emotionally, disagree to all the pessimism: After all Kolkata is home and I live in the hope of an eventual return. Indeed, some change has happened since I wrote my earlier post: The geriatric Leftist government that ruled the state for more than 30 years was summarily dispatched, and was replaced by a lumpen-capitalist populist government. Kolkata looked without a future with the clueless leftists at the helm; it now looks without hope. However, apart from bad governance, there is no reason why Kolkata had to be poor and hopeless. It sits right
Introduction: Hastings in the history of Indian Education Whether or not one includes Warren Hastings in the history of Education in India is a matter of perspective. If writing the history of education means writing the history of schools, the impact of Hastings' administration would be quite limited. If anything, the rapid implosion of local rulers in Eastern, Southern and Northern India during Hastings' tenure had meant a bleak period for the indigenous education system, as patronage and funds would have dwindled away for many of them. The Company administration really concerned itself with the schooling of the natives only after 1813, as Nurullah and Naik rightly pointed out ( see my earlier post ) and one can legitimately start the story at this point. However, if history of Education in India is to encompass the transformation of Indian Scholarship, on which foundation the new, colonial, system of Education would be built, the story must start with Warren Hast
The ‘Why’ Question? Adolf Hitler was appointed the German Chancellor by President Von Hindenburg on 30th January 1933. This was an extraordinary turn of events. Previously, President Von Hindenburg consistently refused to appoint Hitler the Chancellor, despite the impressive electoral performance of NSDAP in July 1932, Hitler’s uncompromising demand of the Chancellor’s post and a repeat election in November 1932 which failed to break the deadlock. Explaining his refusal, Hindenburg wrote in a letter on 24th November, “a presidential cabinet led by you would develop necessarily into a party dictatorship with all its consequences for an extraordinary accentuation of the conflicts in the German people.” The question ‘why’ Hitler was appointed Chancellor, despite the President being acutely aware of what might follow, is therefore a significant one. The NSDAP had election successes throughout 1932, and was already the biggest single party in the Reichstag and various Landtags acros
In our age, the only way to be politically correct is to be democratic. This is a post-70s affair - those days, still, some people had alternative ideologies in mind. Those alternate ideas are dead and gone, long discredited, and it seems that we have only one system which can make people happy, free and live longer. So, we have this huge export industry of democracy, and democracy's warriors, which the American security establishment has lately become. The democracy's businessmen, the bond traders, the media barons and the Hollywood types, are feted everywhere. The consensus is deafening and dumbing. It is indeed awkward to ask now - whether democracy is the right system for every society. It indeed should be. Collective wisdom is better than individual autocracy. In societies where democratic elections have been few and far between, the popular vote has demonstrated the extra-ordinary political savvy of the usually disinterested masses. Democracy has proved to be an excell
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.