I am at it again, after a gap of almost five years, when I am actively searching for a job. This means all the things that come in the package, preparing a CV, posting it on job sites, keeping a watch on job alerts, firing off applications to those positions which remotely match my area of expertise and smarting off after reading through various rejection mails every morning. Despite the disappointments, it is an interesting exercise to do, to get a feel what I am really good at, to study the patterns of rejection letters and infer which one was written with some sympathy and which one was auto-generated, feeling the sense of hope and despair while waiting for some employers who did not say no, overall feeling young again. Also, the interesting thing here is that my heart is not in it, not yet. I am not sure whether I can get back the zeal of sending out 750 applications as I did in the first few weeks after landing in Britain, which earned me 743 straight rejections, 7 interviews and a job. It is not that I am not desperate, I must pay the bills as everyone else; just that I am not sure whether I am over with working for someone else and reached that inflection point in my career when I must look beyond.
However, every day brings some new learning and recently, an interviewer, talking to me for a voluntary position of all things, gave me some valuable feedback. He said - I am not trying to sell myself enough. Indeed, I was not: I thought one is not supposed to brag about one's for-profit expertise while trying to do some good for others. However, the bigger point was that I was possibly too modest, and when I reflected back on all my job search experience so far, I realized this was my biggest mistake - always being modest about who I am and what I have achieved in life.
Now, one can think that would be quite natural while looking for a job. I may advise other people to be strong on the negotiation table pretending that they don't need the job in question, but when it comes to my own job search, I can feel that no one looks for a job unless they have to. A job isn't salvation and when you are sitting across the table with an employer, you are usually more desperate [at least in this recessionary market] than he is. While he may be feeling lucky to be still around - either in his job or business - you are cursing yourself to be sitting in front of him clutching your portfolio and explaining various missing bits of your CV and character. There is indeed a pressure to be modest on you.
But, then, that's not how most people behave. Usually, the successful in the interviews are the ones which bragged most and got the point across. My type will always find it difficult to win over an employer who did not have a prior reference or have not come across me professionally during my time at work. And, you can't blame them - because the whole process of interview is about figuring out who is the greatest candidate on earth interested to take your job, not who showed you respect.
Or, at least so in some cultures than others. My reflections led me to Hofstede, who picked up precisely the same example of interviews to explain one of his cultural 'dimensions' : masculinity/ femininity in a culture. For Hofstede, there are some cultures which value individual achievements more than others. On the scale, there are some which value success and those who advertise success: these are masculine cultures. On the other end, there are cultures where quality of life and soft things like consideration and respectfulness are valued: these are the feminine ones. Britain, as in America, is a highly masculine culture. Here, bragging about one's own achievements and success is normal, and absence of it in a conversation is taken on the face value: of the lack of it. In fact, as Hofstede explained citing an example of his own life, an American interviewer has his own offset parameter set in his mind while he is taking the interview: he is expecting you to brag and if you say 100, he is taking 50 for an answer. Now, when you walk in with all your modesty and call 50, fifty, his offset is still working and you are scoring a zero. This is exactly where I, and many others coming from Asia, may be getting it wrong.
There is also an interesting connected thought worth spending time on. Hofstede dealt with national cultures, though he was fully aware and acknowledged the wide regional variations within these cultures. And, a country like India, with its big size and a billion plus people speaking hundreds of different languages, comes with a great range variation indeed. On Hofstede's scale, India is actually a masculine culture, where individual wealth and success is valued, shown off and talked about. This is quite expected because Hofstede's studies were based on IBM executives in certain Indian cities, a highly successful and competitive group by their own right. However, the regional variations in India is quite plain to see: Do we not catch the difference between Delhi's glitz and Mumbai's utilitarianism and Kolkata's modesty in the plain eye? While I am thinking that it is quite normal for me to be modest, such a thought may not necessarily arise in the mind of someone coming from Northern India, and he may actually be as comfortable talking about what he has achieved in front of an American interviewer and get a perfect score.
Obviously, I am not complaining. I am actually quite happy with the thought, because it gives me a bit of insight on what I need to do, and allows me another dose of optimism that I am not hopelessly out of sync with the market in terms of skills. But, reflecting back on the regional differences, it appears an important point. While in Global trade, the cultural differences are somewhat factored in and dealt with, it is harder to do so within a country. The cultural differences may indeed mean marked differences in professional achievements of different communities within a nation, which may eventually lead to significant chasm inside it. This may make building up national models extremely difficult and foreign businessmen may completely lose the plot as it is fashionable to see India as one entity from outside.
I keep saying, paraphrasing an observation that I read about China, from the outside, India looks like a huge multiplier effect on any business: X times the population of Europe, X times the young population, X times the middle class; however, the moment you set foot in India, it appears to be an endless series of divisions, class, caste, language, religion, regions and states. And, as the above thought illustrates, in terms of talent management, one needs a particularly nuanced approach in India, adjusted to the background of the candidates; otherwise, it will be almost impossible to identify, attract and motivate the best people to work for your company.
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
Introduction Erna Petri née Kürbs, a farmer’s daughter from Herressen in Thuringia, arrived in Ukraine with her three year old son to join her husband Horst in June 1942. Horst, an SS leader inspired by Nazi ideologue Dr Richard Walter Darré, settled in the plantation of Grzenda, just outside today’s Lviv, to become a German Gentleman-Farmer. Erna saw Horst beating and abusing the workers in the plantation within two days of arriving there, which was, as Horst explained, necessary for establishing authority. Erna joined in enthusiastically, settling into a combination of roles of ‘plantation mistress, prairie Madonna in apron-covered dress lording over slave labourers, infant-carrying, gun-wielding Hausfrau.’  However, there were clear rules in the plantation, and Erna was very much expected to play the woman’s role of being a Cake-and-Coffee hostess. When four Jews were caught in the estate while trying to escape from a transport to a death camp, Horst told Erna and her female
I wrote a note on Kolkata, the city I come from and would always belong to, in July 2010. Since then, the post attracted many visitors and comments, mostly critical, as most people, including those from Kolkata, couldn't see any future for the city. My current effort, some 18 months down the line, is also prompted by a recent article in The Economist, The City That Got Left Behind , which echo the pessimism somewhat. I, at least emotionally, disagree to all the pessimism: After all Kolkata is home and I live in the hope of an eventual return. Indeed, some change has happened since I wrote my earlier post: The geriatric Leftist government that ruled the state for more than 30 years was summarily dispatched, and was replaced by a lumpen-capitalist populist government. Kolkata looked without a future with the clueless leftists at the helm; it now looks without hope. However, apart from bad governance, there is no reason why Kolkata had to be poor and hopeless. It sits right
Introduction: Hastings in the history of Indian Education Whether or not one includes Warren Hastings in the history of Education in India is a matter of perspective. If writing the history of education means writing the history of schools, the impact of Hastings' administration would be quite limited. If anything, the rapid implosion of local rulers in Eastern, Southern and Northern India during Hastings' tenure had meant a bleak period for the indigenous education system, as patronage and funds would have dwindled away for many of them. The Company administration really concerned itself with the schooling of the natives only after 1813, as Nurullah and Naik rightly pointed out ( see my earlier post ) and one can legitimately start the story at this point. However, if history of Education in India is to encompass the transformation of Indian Scholarship, on which foundation the new, colonial, system of Education would be built, the story must start with Warren Hast
The ‘Why’ Question? Adolf Hitler was appointed the German Chancellor by President Von Hindenburg on 30th January 1933. This was an extraordinary turn of events. Previously, President Von Hindenburg consistently refused to appoint Hitler the Chancellor, despite the impressive electoral performance of NSDAP in July 1932, Hitler’s uncompromising demand of the Chancellor’s post and a repeat election in November 1932 which failed to break the deadlock. Explaining his refusal, Hindenburg wrote in a letter on 24th November, “a presidential cabinet led by you would develop necessarily into a party dictatorship with all its consequences for an extraordinary accentuation of the conflicts in the German people.” The question ‘why’ Hitler was appointed Chancellor, despite the President being acutely aware of what might follow, is therefore a significant one. The NSDAP had election successes throughout 1932, and was already the biggest single party in the Reichstag and various Landtags acros
In our age, the only way to be politically correct is to be democratic. This is a post-70s affair - those days, still, some people had alternative ideologies in mind. Those alternate ideas are dead and gone, long discredited, and it seems that we have only one system which can make people happy, free and live longer. So, we have this huge export industry of democracy, and democracy's warriors, which the American security establishment has lately become. The democracy's businessmen, the bond traders, the media barons and the Hollywood types, are feted everywhere. The consensus is deafening and dumbing. It is indeed awkward to ask now - whether democracy is the right system for every society. It indeed should be. Collective wisdom is better than individual autocracy. In societies where democratic elections have been few and far between, the popular vote has demonstrated the extra-ordinary political savvy of the usually disinterested masses. Democracy has proved to be an excell
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.