My Linkedin status update - that failed deals sometimes spark positive developments - brought forth a number of sympathetic comments. Some curious, because I was vague; some sympathetic, from those who gave weight to the failure part, and some cheers from those who did not. Those comments were helpful in cheering me up as well and restored my usual playfulness which invariably comes back to me at my own 'dark' moments. I love this, as I can see my own silliness and afford a good laugh. I am at one such strange moment.
I have done it again, dear god! I have again wasted my time in trying to work with a Kolkata businessman, and naively assumed things have changed since I last cared to see. And, I am back to where I was - just that, this time the run was far shorter and my experience helped me confront issues earlier in the life cycle of the project rather than leaving it for later. But, while it lasted, it was a full spectacle of small-mindedness, idiocies and the lack, indeed a complete failure, of imagination, which plague most business enterprises in the city. I must also mention the complete lack of ethics and the respect for other people's time, which, some day, with the hand of god and the market, the business owners in Kolkata have to sort out themselves.
But, in any case, I have learnt my lessons. I should have realized it earlier - Kolkata businessmen are usually big fishes in a small pond, and they are destined to remain that way. In terms of imagination, it is a strange place - you don't need much. All you need is connections - that way CPIM has turned Kolkata quite akin to China - and all these businessowners really know is how to pay their way through. of course, I am extremely bitter and therefore a bit biased, because I wasted an enormous amount of time working with one such pretender, and currently licking my wounds. But, then, it is time for me to have a good laugh at my own silliness, the fact that I ever believed that a modern, service oriented business can ever be set up by any of those petty-bourgeois babus, and reminding myself of my 10 year old maxim of staying out of entanglements in Kolkata.
I have also learnt one of my shortcomings. My belief that anyone can do it in life is an ideological statement, but not very practical. Or, to justify further, anyone can actually do it in life, provided THEY try. I almost assume anyone can do it in life and they will try - that's nonsense in a practical business perspective. In a reflective mood, I sat down and started counting how many people I have come across in last two years who I assumed would really try and then saw that they did try for themselves, and I did not have many. I could only recall one lady, married to one of my friends, who showed significant determination and ambition, and despite fairly trying circumstances, followed her own agenda and is currently on the way of sure success. And, yes, another lady who worked with us who was entrepreneurial from the word go and could have done much more if we provided her enough support to channel her energies.
But, otherwise, I could only recount lethargy, a desparately reactive attitude where people did take salary as a right and a happy-go-lucky life as a given. My assumption that people will stretch themselves to realize their full potential fell flat: who actually cared about full potential? I think a majority of Indian workers, who come from the government families, where they have seen their parents work not too hard for a modest but assured income, start their life with that view of life. I have no other explanation for the strangely reactive, almost fatalistic, behaviour I have seen so far.
Or there is one explanation that may hold some water. The fact that by a strange set of circumstances, I was always looking at the wrong sample. This sample set is mostly ladies in their 30s and 40s, mostly married, with good English [so privileged] and with an almost set in stone expectation out of life. One can possibly see why demographically it may indeed be the wrong set. But even if I accept that this is not representative of modern Indian work ethic [and indeed, I am talking about forty to fifty people at best], it is indeed an issue one needs to think about. Besides, I don't mean to draw a sexist assumption. The only two silver linings I saw in the whole set are indeed ladies with the same background, and the men I met fell far short of those benchmarks anyway. But, I had to conclude that there is some work to be done in terms of work ethic, especially in pushing employees to believe that they have to take responsibility of their own lives, develop continuously and contribute - indeed, it is their duty to contribute at work whatever is the circumstance or the constraints.
In this whole discussion, I still think this self-responsibility part is the most important. Without generalizing, I must say many people in India are so hopelessly caught in this job thing. The change is happening fast - the organizations are outsourcing work and this will only accelearate in the post-recession years - but the free agent nation that will take advantage of this changing workplace is missing in action. The society is not prepared - parents want their children to go to work every morning and come back in the evening, even if this means a demeaning existence and a paltry salary. The individuals who will try to break the mould and create something new without the slavery of a day job are still looked down upon. Then, there is the EMI slavery, where people bought - mostly - cars [and in some cases, houses], beyond their means and would want to waste a greater part of their life just earning enough money to keep paying the monthly payments. The policymakers also want to create jobs - being completely oblivious that in a modern economy, this means encouraging entrepreneurship, as the freewheeling money-printing days of government giving a job to everyone is over. So, this whole structure needs to be shaken at the core and people need to be thrown out of their comfort zone - to discover that there is an alternative future, more attuned to today's world of work.
That's my positive development. I have learnt my lessons and I shall start afresh.
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
Introduction Erna Petri née Kürbs, a farmer’s daughter from Herressen in Thuringia, arrived in Ukraine with her three year old son to join her husband Horst in June 1942. Horst, an SS leader inspired by Nazi ideologue Dr Richard Walter Darré, settled in the plantation of Grzenda, just outside today’s Lviv, to become a German Gentleman-Farmer. Erna saw Horst beating and abusing the workers in the plantation within two days of arriving there, which was, as Horst explained, necessary for establishing authority. Erna joined in enthusiastically, settling into a combination of roles of ‘plantation mistress, prairie Madonna in apron-covered dress lording over slave labourers, infant-carrying, gun-wielding Hausfrau.’  However, there were clear rules in the plantation, and Erna was very much expected to play the woman’s role of being a Cake-and-Coffee hostess. When four Jews were caught in the estate while trying to escape from a transport to a death camp, Horst told Erna and her female
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
A week into lockdown and things are beginning to change. Mornings are late, afternoons are lazier and evenings never end; meditations are filling out the time for Yoga routines and Netflix profiles are strewn with half-finished movies. This state-mandated, state-funded period of idleness is being likened to being called up to serve, but is nothing like that: Such a comparison is really an affront to the idea of service. Instead, this is just one long streak of panic; of the centre not holding and life not going on as usual. With the usual patterns and rules in suspended animation and business talk - and business - being rendered meaningless, space is opening up for unusual questions: Is Capitalism about to end? Is this the death of globalisation? Does it get uglier from here? My grandfather's generation would have scoffed at us. They saw through wars and pandemics. But, in fairness, we haven't had a life-ending crisis of our own. Notwithstanding the experiences of th
The ‘Why’ Question? Adolf Hitler was appointed the German Chancellor by President Von Hindenburg on 30th January 1933. This was an extraordinary turn of events. Previously, President Von Hindenburg consistently refused to appoint Hitler the Chancellor, despite the impressive electoral performance of NSDAP in July 1932, Hitler’s uncompromising demand of the Chancellor’s post and a repeat election in November 1932 which failed to break the deadlock. Explaining his refusal, Hindenburg wrote in a letter on 24th November, “a presidential cabinet led by you would develop necessarily into a party dictatorship with all its consequences for an extraordinary accentuation of the conflicts in the German people.” The question ‘why’ Hitler was appointed Chancellor, despite the President being acutely aware of what might follow, is therefore a significant one. The NSDAP had election successes throughout 1932, and was already the biggest single party in the Reichstag and various Landtags acros
I wrote a note on Kolkata, the city I come from and would always belong to, in July 2010. Since then, the post attracted many visitors and comments, mostly critical, as most people, including those from Kolkata, couldn't see any future for the city. My current effort, some 18 months down the line, is also prompted by a recent article in The Economist, The City That Got Left Behind , which echo the pessimism somewhat. I, at least emotionally, disagree to all the pessimism: After all Kolkata is home and I live in the hope of an eventual return. Indeed, some change has happened since I wrote my earlier post: The geriatric Leftist government that ruled the state for more than 30 years was summarily dispatched, and was replaced by a lumpen-capitalist populist government. Kolkata looked without a future with the clueless leftists at the helm; it now looks without hope. However, apart from bad governance, there is no reason why Kolkata had to be poor and hopeless. It sits right
The Creativity Imperative Businesses today consider creativity of their staff as a critical, possibly the most critical, factor for their ongoing survival. This is because the environment, political, social and commercial, has become so fluid; as Yogi Berra put it, “the future isn’t what it used to be”. Constant change, demanding and more aware customers and citizens, rapid information dissemination through new technologies of information and communication, and intense competitive and regulatory pressures, are pushing companies and people who work for them to innovate and adapt continuously. Set in this context, employee creativity has a whole new meaning. It is traditionally understood as people thinking about products and services, which did not exist before, or tweaking and improving the existing ones. Competitive pressures add to this creativity imperative. Information is fast and cheap, and communication technology is driving the costs of production and distribution
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.