Among the many victims of the pandemic, it will be easy to forget the students who graduated this year. While we focus on the elderly and the vulnerable and try to support those who have lost their jobs or businesses, the graduates - young and relatively less at risk - may appear less worthy of our sympathy. And, yet, the pandemic and the resulting destruction in its wake would mean all carefully laid plans, all the years of toil and dreaming, may fall apart, consigning many to shaky starts and entire lifespans of underachievement.
But a further tragedy is also unfolding in slow motion: Those who will come after, next year and further out still. Corona virus may be tamed with a vaccine, but the pandemic has exposed the inherent weakness of the world we were building: Connected economies with disconnected polities, interdependent lives lived by atomistic individuals, a world faced with long term changes where rewards are all here-and-now. The euphoria of the 1990s, after the fall of Berlin Wall and Anglo-American Capitalism's presumptive victory, is coming to a decisive end. Global economy is decoupling, spheres of influence are emerging again and work is changing. Certain principles, which we held to be self-evident, now appear to be contingent realities and making sense of the world has become increasingly challenging.
Case for new ideas
But this confounds us because we are a pampered generation, nurtured with the false idea that the history has ended and we are on a ride to uninterrupted prosperity. The cruel aberration of 9/11, the meltdown of Great Recession were - to us - exceptions that prove the rule. We did not almost notice the wars on the fringes of the world we cared about: The famine in Yemen, the genocide in Syria, the Libyan civil war were all normalised and factored into our standard middle class existence, no more consequential than Friday evening movie shows. Latest movie releases, video games, cool apps, company valuations, stock markets and house prices mattered more to us than the melting glaciers of the Arctic, burning schools in Palestine or concentration camps in Xinjiang.
This false sense of stability now stands exposed. We have got the tragedy we deserved: A mostly preventable pandemic turned our complacency into a deadly weapon and wrecked havoc. The fragility of our 'civilisation' was instantly and irrevocably exposed: The incompetence of our leaders, the incoherence of our institutions and our collective inability to work with one another are all too plain to see. Many months into the crisis, we still can't figure out what went wrong: As a recent cartoon correctly presented, all our 'superpowers' are currently employed in turning anything incomprehensible into conspiracy theories. And, so we indulge: That is the only way to explain the new reality with old ideas.
But that is precisely the danger to avoid. The vaccine, as we pine for it, will not be the end; nor it will be the beginning of the end. It will merely be the end of the beginning. We would suffer more, as new crisises will emerge, some from the guts of some hitherto harmless animal, some of our own making. The assumptions about the straight-road to prosperity will fall apart; Internet-induced hopes of global cultural convergence will fragment under the technologies of control and digital borders. The globalisation as we knew it is ending; the neoliberal ethos that gave us our goals and our meanings have overreached and now melting away. This is one of those turns in history - only a war, a revolution or a pestilence can bring about a change so big - where new ideas will emerge. The world has to be imagined anew!
A new education
This will mean new ways of doing things, but I am concerned rather narrowly with college education. Right now, this may not be the top priority for the policy-makers, busy as they are with more immediate concerns of public health and economy. But the coming crisis of graduate jobs - and the breakdown of the social contract between the college and its present and future students - would necessitate an urgent and deep transformation of how we educate. The uncertainty is no longer a theory; it is a certainty now. Disruption is no longer a profitable fad; it's now upon us with all its life-transforming ferocity. Soft skills are no longer soft: Our inability to talk to each other clearly and compassionately is no longer the staple of romantic movies; it has led us into this pandemic. Meaning is no longer to be accepted as a given, prosperity can not be achieved by mere striving; the new graduates are being called upon to do something which their predecessors never did - reimagine the world while the world their fathers built falls apart!
It's not surprising that a demand for liberal education has arisen at this turn. Minus the certainty of established economic and social structures, the narrowly technical education - particularly the business education 1990s style - is useless. The assumptions - people as self-interested consumers, leaders as maximisers of shareholder value, etc - do not hold anymore. The idea of commercial society is at risk. The era of multinational companies, and of internet-enabled borderless ideas sphere, are at an end. Republican principles are at war with democratic ones; majorities are claiming the privileges of the universal and public with votes are tearing apart the social contract between the peoples. Making meaning is no longer a idealistic enterprise; being able to transcend self-interest is no longer about climbing Maslow's ladders. It is here and now, a survival need - something must be urgently achieved before the structures come crumbling down.
This urgency is new: This is not about a mythical robot claiming one's future as a book-keeper. This is not about turning our beautiful powerpoint presentations and writing grammatically correct English. This is not about finding an easy route to America and living happily ever after. When dreams end, one must wake up: For new dreams need to be made. This is about making sense, remembering and rediscovering our human essence. It's about the Liberal Education as the pioneers saw it, not one about going back but about going forward with the strength of character and certainty of principles. Then and only then, one can take on the changing world and say - here, let me change you!
Popular posts from this blog
A friend has recently forwarded me a quote from Lord Macaulay's speech in the British Parliament on 2nd February 1835. I reproduce the quote below: "I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." The email requested me to forward me to every indian I know. I was tempted, but there were two oddities about this quote. First, the language, which
Introduction : The Business of Gift Giving Business gift giving has always been common and contentious at the same time. Business gifts are usually seen as an ‘advertising, sales promotion and marketing communication medium’ (Cooper et al , 1991). Arunthanes et al (1994) points out that such gifting is practised usually for three reasons: (a) in appreciation for past client relationships, placing a new order, referrals to other clients, etc.; (b) in the hopes of creating a positive, first impression which might help to establish an initial business relationship; and (c) giving may be perceived as a quid Pro quo (i.e. returning a favour or expecting a favour in return for something). The practitioners of gift-giving generally argue that doing business is often an aggregation of personal interactions and relationships, and gift-giving should be seen as a natural way of maintaining and enhancing these relationships. ‘Business gifts, especially one given in the course of the festive s
Buzzwords have disadvantages. Right now, experiential learning is one, and that means we put the label on everything and it stops to mean anything. Also, this means reasonable conversation about experiential learning becomes difficult - at times such as this, either you preach experiential learning or you are traditional, antiquarian and hopelessly out of touch. But, overlooking the limitations of experiential learning can cause big problems. Experiential Learning does many things - putting practice at the heart of learning is an important paradigm shift - but not everything, and it is important to be aware what it does not do. Usually, we equate the terms Project-based Learning (the method) with Experiential Learning (the idea) and Learning from Experience (the ideal), treating them as one and the same and using the terms interchangeably. Any talk about distinctive meaning of these terms is usually seen as pedantic, but really represent very different ideas about education.
Today, Helen Goddard, 26, a highly popular music teacher of a City School for Girls, has been sentenced to 15 months in prison. Her crime was to carry out a year long lesbian affair with one of her pupils, who appeared in the court and admitted that the affair was consensual and it was she who pressured Helen into the affair. For Helen, a bright musician and a devout Chistian, this is an extraordinary lapse of judgement. Also, she was teaching in the £13,000 private girls only school in London. She was surely aware what the consequences of her action will be. The fact that she still could not stop herself tells us that lovers do not always act rationally, something we always knew. There is more in this affair than personal tragedies. For a start, this has all the dramatic elements: a bright, beautiful teacher more in Julia Roberts mould [as in Mona Lisa Smile], a stiff upper lip school [not unlike Wellesley] and a story like Notes On A Scandal with an added twist. Indeed, Helen
In most societies today, making profits are accepted as moral, if not especially praiseworthy. This was not as obvious as it appears today – people used to be embarrassed about making a profit not so long ago. Crazy as it seems today, it is worth thinking why it was so. Profits, as economists will put it, is the reward for risk-taking, for putting a business enterprise together in the pursuit of an objective. In this definition, remember, profits are not what it is commonly understood to be – the gross middle-line towards the bottom – but a figure net of entrepreneur’s earning [wages for his labour], dividends and interests on borrowed capital, and provisions for building and other physical assets [a sort of rent, offsetting what these assets could have earned if leased out]. This pure profit – surplus – accrues to a business as a reward to its organisation, for the act of entrepreneurship itself. Economists were divided on how this surplus comes about. The conventional wisdom was,
Introduction Erna Petri née Kürbs, a farmer’s daughter from Herressen in Thuringia, arrived in Ukraine with her three year old son to join her husband Horst in June 1942. Horst, an SS leader inspired by Nazi ideologue Dr Richard Walter Darré, settled in the plantation of Grzenda, just outside today’s Lviv, to become a German Gentleman-Farmer. Erna saw Horst beating and abusing the workers in the plantation within two days of arriving there, which was, as Horst explained, necessary for establishing authority. Erna joined in enthusiastically, settling into a combination of roles of ‘plantation mistress, prairie Madonna in apron-covered dress lording over slave labourers, infant-carrying, gun-wielding Hausfrau.’  However, there were clear rules in the plantation, and Erna was very much expected to play the woman’s role of being a Cake-and-Coffee hostess. When four Jews were caught in the estate while trying to escape from a transport to a death camp, Horst told Erna and her female
I wrote a note on Kolkata, the city I come from and would always belong to, in July 2010. Since then, the post attracted many visitors and comments, mostly critical, as most people, including those from Kolkata, couldn't see any future for the city. My current effort, some 18 months down the line, is also prompted by a recent article in The Economist, The City That Got Left Behind , which echo the pessimism somewhat. I, at least emotionally, disagree to all the pessimism: After all Kolkata is home and I live in the hope of an eventual return. Indeed, some change has happened since I wrote my earlier post: The geriatric Leftist government that ruled the state for more than 30 years was summarily dispatched, and was replaced by a lumpen-capitalist populist government. Kolkata looked without a future with the clueless leftists at the helm; it now looks without hope. However, apart from bad governance, there is no reason why Kolkata had to be poor and hopeless. It sits right
Introduction: Hastings in the history of Indian Education Whether or not one includes Warren Hastings in the history of Education in India is a matter of perspective. If writing the history of education means writing the history of schools, the impact of Hastings' administration would be quite limited. If anything, the rapid implosion of local rulers in Eastern, Southern and Northern India during Hastings' tenure had meant a bleak period for the indigenous education system, as patronage and funds would have dwindled away for many of them. The Company administration really concerned itself with the schooling of the natives only after 1813, as Nurullah and Naik rightly pointed out ( see my earlier post ) and one can legitimately start the story at this point. However, if history of Education in India is to encompass the transformation of Indian Scholarship, on which foundation the new, colonial, system of Education would be built, the story must start with Warren Hast
The ‘Why’ Question? Adolf Hitler was appointed the German Chancellor by President Von Hindenburg on 30th January 1933. This was an extraordinary turn of events. Previously, President Von Hindenburg consistently refused to appoint Hitler the Chancellor, despite the impressive electoral performance of NSDAP in July 1932, Hitler’s uncompromising demand of the Chancellor’s post and a repeat election in November 1932 which failed to break the deadlock. Explaining his refusal, Hindenburg wrote in a letter on 24th November, “a presidential cabinet led by you would develop necessarily into a party dictatorship with all its consequences for an extraordinary accentuation of the conflicts in the German people.” The question ‘why’ Hitler was appointed Chancellor, despite the President being acutely aware of what might follow, is therefore a significant one. The NSDAP had election successes throughout 1932, and was already the biggest single party in the Reichstag and various Landtags acros
In our age, the only way to be politically correct is to be democratic. This is a post-70s affair - those days, still, some people had alternative ideologies in mind. Those alternate ideas are dead and gone, long discredited, and it seems that we have only one system which can make people happy, free and live longer. So, we have this huge export industry of democracy, and democracy's warriors, which the American security establishment has lately become. The democracy's businessmen, the bond traders, the media barons and the Hollywood types, are feted everywhere. The consensus is deafening and dumbing. It is indeed awkward to ask now - whether democracy is the right system for every society. It indeed should be. Collective wisdom is better than individual autocracy. In societies where democratic elections have been few and far between, the popular vote has demonstrated the extra-ordinary political savvy of the usually disinterested masses. Democracy has proved to be an excell
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.